<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NC Smoking Ban?</title>
	<link>http://www.groveproject.org/2007/10/22/nc-smoking-ban/</link>
	<description>A concentration of local citizen journalists</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.groveproject.org/2007/10/22/nc-smoking-ban/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.groveproject.org/2007/10/22/nc-smoking-ban/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I thought I'd heard somewhere that NC had the lowest state tobacco tax rate, but this article has South Carolina at an incredible 7 cents a pack!:

&lt;a href="http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20071001/NEWS/710010342" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cigarette tax increase would fund insurance&lt;/a&gt; (Star News)

&lt;p&gt;The bill was vetoed, of course, but it was an effort to get a federal tobacco tax increase from 39 cents to a dollar to fund the children's healthcare coverage that's been in the news so much. I was amazed at that number, 7 cents. That's a deal! Look at NJ at 2.57 a pack *on top* of whatever federal taxes apply. Does that start to change the habit some, I wonder? 

Interesting comment about the economics of such a proposal too:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Rep. Jim McCrery, R-La., did not buy that logic. "To propose funding a growing program with a declining revenue source is, I would submit, irresponsible fiscal policy," he said.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I&#8217;d heard somewhere that NC had the lowest state tobacco tax rate, but this article has South Carolina at an incredible 7 cents a pack!:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20071001/NEWS/710010342" rel="nofollow">Cigarette tax increase would fund insurance</a> (Star News)</p>
<p>The bill was vetoed, of course, but it was an effort to get a federal tobacco tax increase from 39 cents to a dollar to fund the children&#8217;s healthcare coverage that&#8217;s been in the news so much. I was amazed at that number, 7 cents. That&#8217;s a deal! Look at NJ at 2.57 a pack *on top* of whatever federal taxes apply. Does that start to change the habit some, I wonder? </p>
<p>Interesting comment about the economics of such a proposal too:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Rep. Jim McCrery, R-La., did not buy that logic. &#8220;To propose funding a growing program with a declining revenue source is, I would submit, irresponsible fiscal policy,&#8221; he said.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quit Smoking &#187; NC Smoking Ban?</title>
		<link>http://www.groveproject.org/2007/10/22/nc-smoking-ban/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Quit Smoking &#187; NC Smoking Ban?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.groveproject.org/2007/10/22/nc-smoking-ban/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] Read this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Read this great post here [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
